Students collaborated on a list of qualities that, aside from the required content, a quality final product would need to have. This is the list they came up with:
- Clear Organization
- Labels of Parts
- Bullet points of important information
- Skimmable
- Title
- Visually Appealing
- Neat
- Colorful
- Font Consistency
- Visuals Incorporated
- Captions
- History as well as modern culture
- Grammar/Punctuation/Capitalization
- Interesting
- Relevant
- Personal
- Points of Interest
Students were then given 4 minutes to exchange their rough draft with another group. The first two minutes were spent silently critiquing the other group's project based on the criteria above. The second two minutes were split between the groups; each group had one minute to get clarification on any questions or to give their suggestions. This allowed students to both give and receive feedback on their work.
.jpeg)
After four rounds of feedback students were put back in their groups and began to sort through the feedback they were given. They began revisions based on their classmates feedback and will continue those revisions later this week. The final product is due Friday, March 21st but students will have a chance to conference with Mr. Mayes early next week.
.JPG)
With Mrs. Auspelmyer, students reviewed how to write quote analysis and were given a second assignment to practice their skills. Those students who are still having difficulty with quote analysis formed a small group with Mrs. A talked about their weaknesses and the feedback they had received. Students who had previously BINGO'ed their first quote analysis were given the opportunity to BINGO that assignment again. Students were also given a second set of quotes to continue practicing their close reading skills. The second set of quotes will be due Monday and that assignment information is here. .JPG)
.JPG)
No comments:
Post a Comment